Camp Edwards has a variety of natural communities, some unique to Cape Cod. In general the natural communities of Camp Edwards are often referred to as Pine Barrens. Camp Edwards has one of the few remaining stands of Pine Barrens in the Nation. It is the largest Pine Barrens system north of New Jersey.
Pitch pine/scrub oak barrens occur on deep, coarse, well-drained sands derived from glacial outwash, in the coastal plain, the Connecticut River Valley, and other scattered areas throughout the northeast. The sands are acidic, nutrient poor and drought prone. The low vegetation and sandy soils contribute to a tendency to be hotter than more mesic sites on summer days, with greater cooling at night, so have great temperature variations daily. The dry environment with low humidity contributes to the loss of heat at night, as in a desert. Exposure to the temperature variations may make plants more susceptible to other damaging factors such as insects or disease. In pitted outwash plains or rolling moraines, some low bowls, or kettles, are frost pockets and have more heath and lichen and less oak and pine. Deeper kettles may intersect the water table and have a Coastal Plain Pond at the bottom.
Pitch pine/scrub oak barrens are a
fire maintained and fire dependent type of natural community: some of the component species depend on recurrent fires for their existence, and many of the species have volatile oils that actually encourage the spread of fires once they are ignited.
Development on Camp Edwards has historically included barracks, parade grounds, runways, and other facilities. As military activity at Camp Edwards decreased and facilities were abandoned and removed, this newly opened space has become forests and fields. At the same time, areas surrounding the base are developing at an alarming rate. As a result, Camp Edwards now represents an island of undeveloped land surrounded by a sea of development on Cape Cod.
An initial floristic survey of the JBCC identified 433 species of vascular plants (Jenkins 1994). Annual plant and rare plant surveys have identified an additional 124 specimens since 1994, increasing the total number of known plant species on Camp Edwards to 557. Data from the plant surveys originally indicated seven major plant communities on Camp Edwards. These communities were classified according to
The Nature Conservancy Albany Pine Bush Reserve Classification System: mixed woods forest, pitch pine-scrub oak forest, hardwood forest, scrub oak barrens, grasslands, wetlands, and disturbed communities. The natural communities of Camp Edwards and the JBCC in 2004 were reclassified using the
Massachusetts Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program's
Natural Communities Classification (Swain and Keasley 2001). Some smaller undescribed plant communities, such as
aspen Populus depressions also exist within the predominant natural communities.
The plant communities of Camp Edwards are generally classified as mid to late successional forest with intermittent early successional disturbed areas and kettle-hole ponds and wetlands. The climax plant community on Camp Edwards is likely an oak-pine forest with gray birch (
Betula populifolia), American beech (
Fagus grandifolia), and bitternut hickory (
Carya cordiformis) (Foster and Motzkin 1999). Many of the plant communities at Camp Edwards have been influenced by several different factors including fire, ice storms, frost, drought, insect outbreaks, hurricanes, tropical storms, and historic logging and grazing. Natural or human induced fires have played an important role in creating and maintaining the plant communities on Camp Edwards.
The species diversity of the forests of Camp Edwards is generally quite low. On average, 53 species of plants were documented in each plant community of Camp Edwards, which when compared to most fertile woods of western New England that typically have up to 200 plant species, is relatively low (Jenkins 1994).
The following are brief descriptions of the
Natural Communities of Camp Edwards as per the
Classification of Natural Communities (Swain and Kearsely 2001
):